/ 01
KNOWN KNOWNS
What you already measure.
Trees and Rivers maps what you know, what you are missing, what nobody has asked yet, and whether your team can actually use it.
/ Fig. 00 — The method
/ 01
What you already measure.
/ 02
What you know is missing.
/ 03
What is not on the radar.
/ 04
Can the team use it?
/ 05
Will the team act?
/ Output
Useful within the timeframe.
The method does not stop at finding signals. It checks whether the insight can survive the team, the timing and the real world.
Most teams already have data. The problem is that data often explains the result, not the conditions around the result.
Trees and Rivers starts with what is already known, hunts for missing context, then looks for weak, strange or external signals that could change the question.
/ Fig. 01 — The known data pile
The method uses a simple knowledge map. Known knowns are the things your team already measures. Known unknowns are the gaps your team can name. Unknown unknowns are the signals nobody has thought to look for yet.
/ Fig. 02 — The map of what is missing
Likes. Clicks. Shares. Sales.
Missing data. Missing context.
Weak signals. New questions.
Tree Data often starts with known knowns. River Data helps explore known unknowns. UFOs help surface the odd signals that may point towards unknown unknowns.
/ Fig. 03 — The team reality check
Finding the insight is only half the work.
The method also asks whether the team has the skill to use it and the will to act on it. A brilliant insight with no application path is just expensive noise.
Can the team use it?
Will the team act?
Skill is about capability, clarity and confidence. Will is about appetite, alignment and action.
Too much of the industry treats insight like the finish line.
Find the clever thing. Put it in a deck. Leave someone else to fight procurement, politics, timing, language, legal review, personalities, budget and internal resistance.
No.
The best insight is the one that gets applied within the timeframe that matters.
/ Fig. 04 — The deck is not the finish line
/ Fig. 05 — The useful insight filter
Every useful insight has to pass more than one test. It has to be interesting, but it also has to be usable, defensible and timed to the decision.
The method is shaped by human insight work, focus groups, interviews, workshops, campaign rooms, online communities, offline behaviour, brand-side pressure, agency-side delivery and the reality of getting ideas through complex organisations.
It is built for people who have to make marketing decisions with imperfect information.
/ Fig. 06 — The room, the work, the world
/ Fig. 07 — Things we are not selling
This is not weird data for decoration. It is not a dashboard skin. It is not a magic answer. It is not a trend list.
It is a no-bullshit method for turning data, missing context, weak signals, team reality and timing into applied marketing insight.
It helps teams understand what happened, what was moving around it, what might be missing and what can actually be done next.
/ Fig. 08 — The applied insight
A Trees and Rivers insight has to earn its place. It should be useful, defensible, relevant to the task, understandable to the team and capable of improving the decision.
The full method, source library, classification logic, workshop process and application templates are available on request.